Template talk:Ancestry of Australians

	Australia portal Ancestry of Australians is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
	This template is supported by WikiProject Demographics of Australia.

Ethnic groups

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Sorted by?[edit]

Hi - it isn't actually clear how this is sorted. The link is to Country of birth of parents but that figure isn't usually used in the articles. We are quite good at quoting country of birth and ancestry statistics. My preferences is for country of birth to drive the ranking. --Matilda ^talk 07:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made all the bolded ancestries in number order, but the other ones are just random i think. They are by ancestry if you guessed, and aboriginals at the top for obvious reasons. PMK1 (talk) 13:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now sorted by ancestry reposnses in 20680-Ancestry by Country of Birth of Parents per link in template --Matilda ^talk 07:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the british one anyway bold, no matter what group u click on? 60.224.3.243 (talk) 18:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sudanese[edit]

Shouldn't Sudanese be listed under Africa as opposed to Asia - West? Egyptian, which is closer to the Middle East/Asia is listed under Africa. Gizza^Discuss ^© 07:31, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and made the change. In my opinion this was an obvious mistake but anyone is entitled to talk about it here if they wish. Gizza^Discuss ^© 11:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

North African and Middle Eastern[edit]

According to Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic Groups (ASCCEG)^[1] the follwing is a list of ethnic groups belonging to the category of North African and Middle Eastern:

ARAB: Algerian, Egyptian, Iraqi, Jordanian, Kuwaiti, Lebanese, Libyan, Moroccan, Palestinian, Saudi Arabian, Syrian, Tunisian, Yemeni, Bahraini, Emirati, Omani, Qatari, Arab, nec
JEWISH: Jewish
Peoples of the Sudan: Bari, Darfur, Dinka, Nuer, South Sudanese, Sudanese, Peoples of the Sudan, nec
Other North African and Middle Eastern: Berber, Coptic, Iranian, Kurdish, Turkish, Assyrian, Chaldean, Mandaean, Nubian, Yezidi, Other North African and Middle Eastern, nec

So according to this, the above Ethnic Groups are NOT Asian Australian and instead should be classified as North African and Middle Eastern respectfully. SCN 1999 (talk) 03:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ "1249.0 - Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic Groups (ASCCEG), 2016". Australian Bureau of Statistics. 18 December 2019. Archived from the original on 23 June 2019. Retrieved 23 June 2019.

[auto-1] "1249.0 - Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic Groups (ASCCEG), 2016". Australian Bureau of Statistics. 18 December 2019. Archived from the original on 23 June 2019. Retrieved 23 June 2019.

[1]