User talk:Arjayay

E-mails

You can use "Email this user", but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.
I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours.

Broadcasted

The Wiktionary definition of Broadcasted states the use is sometimes proscribed, so it should not be used. The word also appears on Wikipedia:Lists_of_common_misspellings/B

Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Wikipedia tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".

A May 2023 search for Broadcast gave over 234,000 uses, compared with a search for Broadcasted which gave just 99.
Of these, 16 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles, 14 refer to a 2015 Canadian TV award and 5 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are in quotations.

---

---

Social media

hey @Arjayay, You just removed the social links, which I added in some posts. I just wanted to know wether it is why it is noe=t allowed, as there are many posts with social profiles, Chocooooo (talk) 11:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Chocooooo, Please create a new section when you start a new topic. As for your question, as I have already explained on your talk page, adding social media links to people's articles contravenes WP:NOSOCIAL. You should also read WP:ELMINOFFICIAL. In certain, limited, situations, one official link is allowed. As for other articles, please see WP:OTHERCONTENT. There are, indeed, many articles where these are already, incorrectly, linked; however, we are trying to reduce this, not increase it - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 11:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Notifying a Reversion

Hi , Arjyay

I have recently reverted the page Nangeli to your version as from the history of the page , it seems that you have made similar revisions multiple times. Can you please check , Iambornwithasword2024 (talk) 04:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Don't do changes on topic-Raut caste

With all due respect, I want to say that , don't change information on article of Raut caste. May be you've some misinformation about it. I'm a Raut so I know better about it. Thank you Raut Ankit (talk) 04:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Sorry Raut Ankit, but that is NOT the way Wikipedia works:-
Wikipedia is not interested in who you are, where you are from, what caste you are or what you "know".
Wikipedia is only interested in what has been published in reliable, independent sources, by a body with a reputation for fact-checking - No blogs, no self-published sources, no bodies with a conflict of interest, no promotional sites.
These sources must be properly cited in order to support any information added to, or changed in our pages, so the information can be verified as true in the future.
The responsibility for providing citations is solely on whoever adds or changes any information, to provide references from reliable sources that support those additions or changes.
You are not doing this, which is why your edits have been reverted. I see your last re-additions were reverted by User:DMacks - an administrator.
Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for the "how to" guide. Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 09:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Arjayay, although it's a mistake for Raut Ankit to make edits without explanation and the source they now identify is not an allowed one, this specific article is a more complex situation. See its history and the ES in my later edits. DMacks (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding recent edits

Kindly explain the guidelines violated by me or any type of vandalism done. Don't make false allegations and accuse falsely. You don't own Wikipedia, I have not made any false edits or not added any false information nor violated any guidelines. I have just updated the page to look better with accurate information.

I recently updated Hyderabad's settlement type from Metropolis to Megacity because Hyderabad city has grown into a megacity. You can cross check. You cannot really control a universal site. Else there is no benefit of editing, improving or making any contributions to Wikipedia. Expecting a reply soon. Anonymous copy (talk) 17:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Anonymous copy:- As that article clearly states, right next to your change " <!-- Not a Megacity, as the population of the city is under 10 million residents -->" - From your post, I presume you are referring to an unofficial "estimate", whereas we are working off the official census figures. The 2011 census of India ([1] page 3} clearly states that there are only 3 Megacities in India. We know the 2021 census is unlikely to be taken until late in 2024, and unlikely to report until 2025, but we need to wait until then, not only for the official population figure, but also as they may change their definition of Megacity. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 19:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

But can it be classified as an act of Vandalism ? As you have issued a warning ? and according to estimates Hyderabad has already crossed 10 million population. If you don't rely on estimates and want to rely on census then revert the urban agglomerations page to 2011 census figures. Anonymous copy (talk) 19:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding recent Edit

and regarding my second edit on list of largest agglomeration page I have first verified the fact then only made the edit. I do know that editing false information may lead to loss of editing rights. You don't know the exact stats. You can verify from wherever you want. Didn't expect this bad behavior from your side. Anonymous copy (talk) 17:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Anonymous copy - I still see this as pure falsification, you simply changed the titles of two entries in the table, without any alteration of the figures, from

Lucknow - Uttar Pradesh - 4,661,000 - 393.6 - 2,901,474 - 2,245,50 - 1,669,204

Jaipur - Rajasthan - 4,360,000 - 484.16 - 3,073,350 - 2,322,575 - 1,518,235

to

Jaipur - Rajasthan 4,661,000 - 393.6 - 2,901,474 - 2,245,509 - 1,669,204

Lucknow - Uttar Pradesh 4,360,000 - 484.16 - 3,073,350 - 2,322,575 - 1,518,235

It is not up to me, or any other editor, or reader to "verify from wherever you want" the BURDEN is on you as the changing editor, to provide all the required references - Arjayay (talk) 19:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

ok I will provide the relevant data. this data is already incorrect (as edited by last editor). I admit that figures should also be edited by me and I will take care of it the next time, but the ranking given by me is absolutely correct and the edit was done in good faith and not to vandalize. But I will still make sure to make less contributions to Wikipedia. Anonymous copy (talk) 03:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Need Help for Article Publishing

Hi Arjayay, i want to publish a new article. can you help me? Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 19:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

hello @Arjayay,

You may find it interesting to help expand this Draft base on the sources.

We need sections like Background, Activities, History and so on.

Sorry Mr. Vikash Thakur, I don't have enough time to publish articles on subjects I am interested in, and know something about, to get involved in a subject I know nothing about.
Your post is almost identical to that by «fjuːgəbʌs» immediately below. Are you using multiple accounts? - Arjayay (talk) 10:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Biafra Republic

hello @Arjayay,

You may find it interesting to help expand this Draft base on the sources.

We need sections like Background, Activities, History and so on. «fjuːgəbʌs» (talk) 20:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Sorry «fjuːgəbʌs», I don't have enough time to publish articles on subjects I am interested in, and know something about, to get involved in a subject I know nothing about
Your post is almost identical to that by Mr. Vikash Thakur immediately above. Are you using multiple accounts? - Arjayay (talk) 10:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding Western UP Article

Hi ! @Arjayay , I want the discussion regarding the article page of West UP. In demographics it is mentioned that Jat' are around 17% but on talk page of the article some guy show articles from renowned news papers that all that data is just assumption of the author who wrote the article. So my point is we must removed this caste percentage in the article. Mr. Pro 11:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding recent edit

I saw you reverted my edit made to page of Hyderabad, Telangana settlement type changed from "Metropolis" to "Megacity" by me. I would like to share relevant sources to support my answer

Hyderabad estimated population figures 2024 = 11,068,877, which is clearly > 10 million. Hence, Hyderabad qualifies as a Megacity.

Source url = Hyderabad Population 2024 (worldpopulationreview.com)

another sources which supports Hyderabad population > 10 million

url 2 = Hyderabad, India Metro Area Population 1950-2024 | MacroTrends

url 3 = Hyderabad Population 2024 (populationu.com)

url 4 = Population of cities in India 2024 - StatisticsTimes.com

url 5 = Hyderabad, India Population (2024) - Population Stat

url 6 = Hyderabad (Greater Hyderabad) Metropolitan Urban Region Population 2011-2024 Census (census2011.co.in)

url 7 = Hyderabad Population in 2024, Demographics, City Size, Population Growth (cinemamanishi.com)

Now, I would request you to publish my edit. (talk) 18:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

I got an identical posting, which I moved to Talk:Hyderabad#Metropolis or Megacity. I have commented there.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Anonymous copy - Thank you for your detailed post - I have also responded at Talk:Hyderabad - to keep the discussion in one place - Arjayay (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda Arendt - 8 years? doesn't time fly when you are enjoying yourself ! - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 09:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Complaint

Hello, I would like to complain against User talk:Ravensfire regarding his edits on MTV Splitsvilla (season 15). He removed an important element from the page "Ideal Match" section calling it unsourced fan trivia, which is false. I have reverted his edit but now he just want to keep it as he wants which is not right. I have been active on the MTV Splitsvilla (season 15) page and I know what should he there. I even added references. Please tell him to do some research and not indulge in edit wars without any knowledge regarding the article. Help Me. Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 04:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

@Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law as I've pointed out, it's WP:FANCRUFT in an article already full of excessive details. I've invited them to discuss on the article talk page and work through WP:DR. Ravensfire (talk) 04:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

There is no WP:DR because there is no dispute honestly. All i want to request is do some research regarding the article. Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 04:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law, I do not know why you have posted here, I am not an Administrator and, other than correcting "recieve" to "receive", I have never edited that page, and have no interest in the subject whatsoever. Ravensfire is correct in saying you should discuss it on the article talk page. You need to cite WP:reliable sources, published by a body with a reputation for fact checking, not a fansite, blog or opinion piece. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 09:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm new to the community, I do not know where to find justice. I have added WP:reliable sources from a reputed body. I know him well, he just like to take control and don't listen to others' opinion. No body have an issue it has been part for over previous five seasons. Who I am supposed to talk on talk page? It's only him with a problem. Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 09:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law you won't "find justice" until you follow procedure, which starts with discussing it on the talk page.
This has been suggested to you several times, but you still have not edited the talk page. On the talk page, other interested editors can join-in inone, centralised discussion; please do not discuss it here, or anywhere else. Set out your points, citing your reliable sources, show that they are reliable and ask why the other editor finds them unacceptable.
Please do not start attacking, or disparaging, other editors, just concentrate on the facts. - Arjayay (talk) 10:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Sure, I will start a discussion on talk page. I am not attacking, or disparaging, the user did that before as well on other articles. If you do not believe me kindly check his talk page. The user is self centered. Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 10:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)