User talk:Ewout12345

Libris History Prize moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Libris History Prize. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Schminnte ^{[talk to me]} 21:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anne-Lot Hoek for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anne-Lot Hoek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne-Lot Hoek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:44, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A new page was created that addressed the feedback. See Anne-Lot Hoek Ewout12345 (talk) 21:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Libris History Prize (November 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Libris History Prize and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This has been adjusted and now it is live. Ewout12345 (talk) 21:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ewout12345! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 22:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rode Hoed moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Rode Hoed. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Anne-Lot Hoek[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Anne-Lot Hoek, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anne-Lot Hoek[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anne-Lot Hoek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne-Lot Hoek. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion got cancelled (the contested deletion was added to the Talk page after which deletion was cancelled); an entire revised version was created. Ewout12345 (talk) 21:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Ewout12345. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Anne-Lot Hoek, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I hope you have seen I am open about my relationship and this tag has been placed and removed in the past as the article was enriched by many secondary and tertiary sources, now constituting 2/3 of 143 references. The primary articles are used to back statements (not quotes about herself, but proof that e.g. she works on specific topics). I hardly make any changes anymore, once in while updates like the new fellowship in 2024, her next book will be in a few years time. Those COI and other tags were removed as they have checked and seen it was okay, hope you will reach the same conclusion over time. Thank you for reaching out and your hard work in contributing to everyone’s knowledge. Ewout12345 (talk) 21:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rode Hoed[edit]

Hello, Ewout12345. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rode Hoed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]