User talk:S0091

This is S0091's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Scam Watch

Warning: There is an on-going scam targeting people who would like Wikipedia to have an article about them. See this scam warning for detailed information.
If you've been scammed please send details to paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org to help others who could be future victims of this scam.

The Signpost: 16 May 2024[edit]

News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections

Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?

Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24

In the media: Deadnames on the French Wikipedia, and a duel between Russian wikis

Op-Ed: Wikidata to split as sheer volume of information overloads infrastructure

Comix: Generations

Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tabitha Holton[edit]

Hello, S0091. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tabitha Holton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your undos of my edits[edit]

You recently undid three of my edits, and all were improper. I invite constructive changes that build on these edits, and I ask you in the future to please discuss these topics on my talk page before wholesale removing them.

Your problem with my Pennsylvania State University Libraries edit was stated variously as promotion, NPOV and poorly sourced. None of these is true. This was well sourced by reliable media outlets. It was a very active topic of discussion at the time and is very relevant to the topic. I have no connection to the topic, so I have nothing to promote. I added additional sourcing and an rebuttal to the Freeh report, however.

Your problem with my Jessie Inchauspé ‎edit is similarly false. Again, I have nothing to promote. As you can see in the edits, however, the author of the vast majority of that page has disclosed a conflict of interest. It was previously a mess of NPOV with almost no refutation of Inchauspé's claims, despite the fact that she is not a health professional and there have been many criticisms of her by scientific and health professionals. I simply added a small sampling of those fact-based, scientific arguments by relevant experts, with extensive sourcing.

Lastly, your problem with my Matthew S. Petersen edit is the most poorly supported. The page previously erroneously attributed opinion columns in two news outlets to the staff of those outlets. The authors of those columns are not on those staffs and in fact had current and former positions at the time that were extremely relevant to Petersen's confirmation and the opinions they were expressing, creating conflicts of interest. All I added were proper context to the quoted statements. Distance6212 (talk) 20:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Distance6212 As for Pennsylvania State University Libraries, a blog, which are not fact-checked, written by someone on behalf of the family is a primary source and is a minority view, unless there are secondary reliable sources that support Thornburgh's analysis. Also, the ESPN source did not fully support the content so I have made amendments. Another editor has also now reverted your changes to Jessie Inchauspé also citing NPOV. See also WP:DAILYMAIL, which is a deprecated source so should not be used. I also made a slight amendment to Matthew S. Petersen. S0091 (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Robert_W._Amler[edit]

Hi @S0091,

I added information to the article based on the information requested. Would you be able to take a look? Draft:Robert W. Amler Jrodriguezrentas (talk) 16:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of old merge at Lasky-DeMille Barn[edit]

Hi there, you seem to have reverted a merge in this diff [1]. As far as I can tell, this merge gained consensus three years ago, and none of the editors in the merge discussion are blocked for "UPE/sock", as your username suggests. Neither is the editor who performed the merge. Could you please explain this revert? Toadspike [Talk] 19:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toadspike thanks for catching my oversight. I have reverted myself. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do. S0091 (talk) 19:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for fixing that so quickly! Toadspike [Talk] 19:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toadspike as my edit summary indicates, I am going through some UPE/sock edits. If you happen to come across any others where I missed something, please feel free to revert me. Actually, you can do that anytime. If I have a concern, I'll let you know but most likely I will trust your reasoning and let it be. S0091 (talk) 19:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you! Accidents happen, I appreciate the quick and polite response. Toadspike [Talk] 19:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tabitha Holton[edit]

Hello, S0091. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tabitha Holton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]